So I'm pitching a potential client tomorrow. This is a company with an extremely high brand recognition and brand equity. I've been spending the past few days researching their social media brand.
As a HubSpot fan, of course, I ran them through the grader. Stunned that their
twitter grade is, in fact, 1.5% higher than me. I was hoping to be able to go into the meeting tomorrow and shuffle the grader printout in front of them and use it as a tool to educate them. I would have been able to use a tool backed by another highly recognized and respected brand. But now I'm just going to quietly redirect my approach.
So what went wrong?
Honestly, the
twitter grader is just an algorithm fed machine and it can be tricked. My "customer" (let's think positively that I'm going to win this account) has a rapidly growing number of followers on Twitter. This is due to two things - instant brand recognition and the fortune of having people easily 'retweet' (also known in English as repeat) their comments. That immediately gives the algorithm a, lets call it, 'false positive'. The customer is currently using push marketing techniques to promote product offerings. All they are saying is: Check out our special thing/event/product. Due to the brand equity, other people are retweeting these comments. This is not necessarily due to the fact that what my customer said was so interesting, but the fact that retweeting my customers comments will give the one sending out the message a more 'upscale' look. It's not savvy at work here, it's someone piggybacking on someone else's brand equity. At the end of the day, the people retweeting are not going to be a high percentage of customer conversions.
More algorithm mayhem:
From the article cited above and written by HubSpot I quote:
2. Power of Followers: If you have people with a high Twitter Grade following you, it counts more than those with a low Twitter Grade following you. It’s a bit recursive, and we don’t get carried away with it, but it helps.
Again this is a little algorithmic smoke and mirrors with this account. This account is a chain. It is only following its own sister-locations and two individuals. (The sister locations are reciprocally following my customer.) The instant brand equity of the chain artificially inflates the value of the follower power noted in HubSpot. Each location has a number of followers - creating an 'infinite loop' of power for increasing your Twitter Grade. Again, a misleading trick (without being intentionally deceptive) resulting in a way throw off the calculators.
Next, and I don't know what is happening here with this one, but the Follower/Following ratio is way out of whack with my customer. Customer is following a few dozen twitter accounts and is being followed by a few hundred people. The number of followers is more than 12 times greater than the ones they are following.
There are a few other points I can make, but like the brilliant
Dharmesh Shah, writer of the algorithm and article - I don't want to give away all of my know-how either!
At the end of this day, my customer is not using twitter to engage, they are still pushing content. They are not following people within their 'sweet spot' (the local twitter-using potential and existing customers) and they are barely listening to their followers. I see a lot of opportunity for this customer to become the next case-study darling in Social Media Marketing. Hopefully they want this for themselves as badly as I do!